16.08.2012, 13:54, "Mark Summerfield" <l...@qtrac.plus.com>: > Hi, > > I hope that Digia proves to be a good steward of Qt---for Qt/Desktop > users as well as for Qt/Mobile users! > > Here are some of the things I'd like to see in a future Qt.* > > - A full C++ API for all the things that currently can only be done > using QML/JavaScript so that everything can be programmed purely in > C++ (or purely in whatever language you have bindings for).
+1 > > - An introspection API similar in spirit to the one provided by Gtk+ > which is specifically designed to make it as straightforward as > possible to add language bindings to Qt. Do you want every field to be a property and every method to be a slot? You can have it right now. It just destroys some optimizations which C++ compilers can do, e.g. elimination of unused or fully-inlined methods. > > - One or more official language bindings using the introspection API, > e.g., for Python and for Java. > > (This is not a criticism of PySide; indeed I personally prefer using > Python, but I think that it would be better if Qt provided a more > language-agnostic---and uniform---approach to language bindings.) I think Michal Kottman (maintainer of lqt project) is doing the right thing (tm): Clang-based binding generator [1]. In theory it should work for any target language, and you don't need any introspection API at all. [1] https://github.com/mkottman/luaclang-parser -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
