Thanks John and all the others voicing their support. Many things are indeed rather unclear yet, so please give me and the others Qt developers from Nokia a break. We're working very hard trying to get some clarity here and finding solutions.
But don't forget that Qt is an open source project, and that there is a large interest into it from many different industries. So Qt will live on whatever happens. The contributor summit is coming up in a couple of days in Berlin. I hope we'll know more by then. Lars On 6/16/12 11:10 AM, "ext John Layt" <jl...@kde.org> wrote: >On 16 June 2012 09:43, Linos <i...@linos.es> wrote: >> El 16/06/12 10:27, Stefan Walter escribió: >>> Let's wait for a proper official statement from Nokia about the future >>>of Qt. >>> >>> Stop this desperate thoughts about forking Qt, because if Nokia will >>>support it in the future or not will not change the existence of the Qt >>>project. >> >> +1, seriously, i think this is not helping in any way, we need to wait >>for an >> official statement. > >Indeed. We have the Qt Contributors Summit next week where everyone >actually involved in developing Qt will be meeting to discuss our >future plans, and you can be sure we will be discussing this in >detail. > >Anyone who suggests forking seriously underestimates the resources >required to run a project like Qt. There is no point to a fork, it's >just splitting resources. Whatever happens needs to be as a single >project under Open Governance. > >Let's wait and see what happens in the next couple of weeks.. > >John. >_______________________________________________ >Interest mailing list >Interest@qt-project.org >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
