On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Constantin Makshin <cmaks...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think that "mobile distraction" was really bad (but IMHO Symbian > took more attention than it deserved) — there are not many frameworks > that would be as both feature-rich and close to the "wrote once, run > everywhere" principle as Qt.
Nokia did some decisions that are not good at all for Qt community but it does not mean that Qt is dead what ever Nokia does. It is still everyone's choice what framework to use for software development but I just start thinking what else I could use if not Qt ? I would like to have my application running on my Linux and Mac desktops and on my iPad and Android tablets. There is really very little choices. Just using plain C++ and OpenGL(ES) and then homegrown toolkit over it is just re-inventing wheel. Rewrite UI with platform specific toolkit looks only viable alternative and that requires a lot of more work. So, if you love Qt would like to make cross platform applications with reasonable effort, Qt is still your best friend. I don't know what will be Nokia's role in Qt in future but I know that Qt will live and evolve and it is still number one framework choice for many developers. Kate _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
