On segunda-feira, 23 de abril de 2012 18.16.44, Stephen Chu wrote: > On 4/23/12 5:45 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On segunda-feira, 23 de abril de 2012 17.19.56, Michael Jackson wrote: > >> Gack. I got Qt 4.8 and Qt 5 confused in my last post. As you say, Qt 4.8 > >> should build in 32 bit mode without a problem. I think Tier 2 support > >> means > >> best try but not officially supported. So I would say that if compiling > >> Qt > >> 5 in 32 bit mode actually works great. If it does not then qt-project is > >> not going to put time into fixing it. > > > > You're inverting cause and consequence there. > > > > The "Tier" level is attributed based on how much work there is on testing. > > Not the other way around. > > > > So Mac OS X 10.6 is Tier 2 because it has not enough testing: most > > developers and most test runs are run on 10.7 only. > > > > Though, looking at the CI runs right now, it does test 10.6. Therefore, I > > actually think it deserves the Tier 1 label. > > This is the doc I mentioned: > > http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt_5.0
That's a wiki. Feel free to update it with more recent information. > But there are so many different versions of the same info. I don't even > know which to believe: > > http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/5.0/supported-platforms.html > http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/supported-platforms.html 5.0 isn't released. The usually about the platforms supported at release are updated usually close to the release. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027 Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
