Right, KDChart is available in both GPL and commercial license, see https://customers.kdab.com/ :)
-----Original Message----- From: interest-bounces+mathieu.stefani=supinfo....@qt-project.org [mailto:interest-bounces+mathieu.stefani=supinfo....@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Bob Hood Sent: mardi 27 mars 2012 18:02 To: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] Does it really worth it? On 3/27/2012 3:58 PM, STEFANI Mathieu wrote: > Concerning chart libraries and Qt, Qwt has already been mentioned but > I would like to mention KDChart > (http://www.kdab.com/kdab-products/kd-chart/) as well, which is, to my > mind, a better alternative than Qwt, since it's taking advantage of > Model/View architecture and is really convenient to use, with a nice API. > > I'm using it on a personal project and I can say it's working very well. An added element for comparison, though, is that Qwt appears to be free. The KDAB site really doesn't make it easy to figure out their licensing, but from what I can tell, KDChart is not. (Feel free to correct me here if I'm wrong.) Render me gone, ||| Bob ^(===)^ ---------------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo--------------------------------- I'm not so good with advice...can I interest you in a sarcastic comment? _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
