Hi Matilainen,

thanks for such good news.
Is there also a release date for 4.8.1 available?

Best Regards

Am 20.12.2011 um 07:10 schrieb Matilainen Pasi <[email protected]>:

> On 18.12.2011, at 14.02, Ben Lau wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Ben Lau <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Till Oliver Knoll 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> * Qt app + QtWebKit: absolute no-go for Apple App Store
>> 
>> * Qt App without QtWebKit: good to go (provided all the Qt "App Store" 
>> patches are applied)
>> 
>> It is pity to have this conclusion... Just interest to know any chance to 
>> have Digg support a commercial version of Qt for App store?
>> 
>> Sorry, should be Digia..
> 
> I work at Qt Commercial R&D at Digia, and I have been looking at the issues 
> preventing Qt apps from being accepted into the Mac App Store. It is on our 
> agenda to make the path of Qt apps into the App Store as easy as possible, 
> and all related patches will of course be submitted for merging into the LGPL 
> release, so any patches related to the App Store won't be limited to the 
> commercial version only. We will submit our changes for both 4.8.1 and 5.0, 
> but 4.8.1 currently has a priority for us, as that release will happen sooner.
> 
> The App Store requirements and review process seem to be moving targets, but 
> if there are no new major issues, it should be considerably easier to get 
> applications based on Qt 4.8.1 into the App Store. Chris Meyer's patches of 
> course have a large part in this, as they tackle some of the most important 
> problems; I have been in contact with Chris about the App Store issues, and 
> will continue working with him to get them sorted out.
> 
> Pasi Matilainen
> Qt Commercial R&D
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to