On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:23:14AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> A side effect of removing the midlayer from driver loading was the loss
> of a useful message announcing to userspace that i915 had successfully
> started, e.g.:
> 
>       [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20160425 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
> 
> Reported-by:  Timo Aaltonen <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 8f460e2c78f2 ("drm/i915: Demidlayer driver loading")
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 6db1869e2c97..01757369d2d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1263,6 +1263,11 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct pci_dev *pdev, const 
> struct pci_device_id *ent)
>  
>       intel_runtime_pm_enable(dev_priv);
>  
> +     /* Everything is in place, we can now relax! */
> +     DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n",
> +              driver.name, driver.major, driver.minor, driver.patchlevel,
> +              driver.date, pci_name(pdev), dev_priv->drm.primary->index);
> +
>       intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>  
>       return 0;
> -- 
> 2.9.3
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to