We don't need to incur the overhead of checking whether the object is
pinned prior to changing its madvise. If the object is pinned, the
madvise will not take effect until it is unpinned and so we cannot free
the pages being pointed at by hardware. Marking a pinned object with
allocated pages as DONTNEED will not trigger any undue warnings. The check
is therefore superfluous, and by removing it we can remove a linear walk
over all the vma the object has.

Still despite it being an overzealous check, that error code is part of
the current ABI and so we must proceed with caution.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 063c56f5d6f8..7e6b7853f9d7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3883,11 +3883,6 @@ i915_gem_madvise_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void 
*data,
                goto unlock;
        }
 
-       if (i915_gem_obj_is_pinned(obj)) {
-               ret = -EINVAL;
-               goto out;
-       }
-
        if (obj->pages &&
            obj->tiling_mode != I915_TILING_NONE &&
            dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_PIN_SWIZZLED_PAGES) {
@@ -3906,7 +3901,6 @@ i915_gem_madvise_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 
        args->retained = obj->madv != __I915_MADV_PURGED;
 
-out:
        i915_gem_object_put(obj);
 unlock:
        mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-- 
2.8.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to