On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:08:05PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 01:47:34PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > On pe, 2016-07-15 at 11:11 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > +#define NO_WAITBOOST ERR_PTR(-1)
> >
> > This does not seem to be a very common idiom in kernel, just add flags
> > maybe.
>
> I find the special values for the client (including the existing NULL
> client) much more informative.
Is it more pleasant with...?
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index bfec4a88707d..aedc15d46463 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ complete:
*timeout = 0;
}
- if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rps) &&
+ if (IS_RPS_CLIENT(rps) &&
req->fence.seqno == req->engine->last_submitted_seqno) {
/* The GPU is now idle and this client has stalled.
* Since no other client has submitted a request in the
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
index f7f497a07893..b3fe80d4eb63 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
struct intel_rps_client;
#define NO_WAITBOOST ERR_PTR(-1)
+#define IS_RPS_CLIENT(p) (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
