On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:45:52PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 01:47:49PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > Chris Wilson <[email protected]> writes:
> > 
> > > Since the suspend_work can arm itself if the console_lock() is currently
> > > held elsewhere, simply calling flush_work() doesn't guarantee that the
> > > work is idle upon return. To do so requires using cancel_work_sync().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
> 
> Cc: [email protected] I presume? Checking for this should be part of
> the review ...

No known bug - unlikely since ~nobody unloads the module.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to