Regards
Shashank

On 5/31/2016 9:35 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 02:55:42PM +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote:
@@ -78,6 +97,7 @@ enum drm_dp_dual_mode_type {
        DRM_DP_DUAL_MODE_TYPE1_HDMI,
        DRM_DP_DUAL_MODE_TYPE2_DVI,
        DRM_DP_DUAL_MODE_TYPE2_HDMI,
+       DRM_DP_DUAL_MODE_LSPCON,
  };

  enum drm_dp_dual_mode_type drm_dp_dual_mode_detect(struct i2c_adapter 
*adapter);
@@ -89,4 +109,13 @@ int drm_dp_dual_mode_set_tmds_output(enum 
drm_dp_dual_mode_type type,
                                     struct i2c_adapter *adapter, bool enable);
  const char *drm_dp_get_dual_mode_type_name(enum drm_dp_dual_mode_type type);

+int drm_dp_dual_mode_ioa_read(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u8 *buffer,
+               u8 offset, u8 no_of_bytes);
+int drm_dp_dual_mode_ioa_write(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u8 *buffer,
+               u8 offset, u8 no_of_bytes);
+int drm_dp_dual_mode_get_edid(void *data,
+       u8 *buf, unsigned int block, size_t len);

These look like leftovers from an earlier attempt.
Yes, I noticed I missed them during cleanup. Will remove these.

+enum drm_lspcon_mode drm_lspcon_get_current_mode(struct i2c_adapter *adapter);
+int drm_lspcon_change_mode(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
+               enum drm_lspcon_mode reqd_mode);
  #endif
--
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to