On Mon, 02 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:31:44AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:38 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > > > > > GPIO lookup tables are supposed to be zero terminated. Let's do that > > > and avoid accidentally walking off the end. > > > > > > Cc: Shobhit Kumar <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Lee Jones <[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Fixes: 61dd2ca2d44e ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Add lookup table for > > > Panel Control as GPIO signal") > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > > Applied to drm-intel trees, thanks for patch, reviews&acks.
Do what now? How can you apply a patch for a subsystem you don't have responsibility for? This is bound to cause merge conflicts. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
