On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:32:07PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> 
> While not technically needed on the last case in the switch statement,
> the 'break' makes it look better IMO.
> 
> v2: Fixed a typo in the commit message (Paulo)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 9f8ab09eb411..edc034dc38b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -9808,6 +9808,7 @@ static void haswell_get_ddi_pll(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>               break;
>       case PORT_CLK_SEL_SPLL:
>               pipe_config->shared_dpll = DPLL_ID_SPLL;
> +             break;
>       }
>  }

Merged up to this patch. Thanks for the reviews.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to