On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:15:18PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, [email protected] wrote:
> > @@ -1012,35 +1012,16 @@ intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, 
> > struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >  static uint32_t g4x_aux_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >                             enum port port)
> >  {
> > -   switch (port) {
> > -   case PORT_B:
> > -           return DPB_AUX_CH_CTL;
> > -   case PORT_C:
> > -           return DPC_AUX_CH_CTL;
> > -   case PORT_D:
> > -           return DPD_AUX_CH_CTL;
> > -   default:
> > -           MISSING_CASE(port);
> > -           return DPB_AUX_CH_CTL;
> > -   }
> > +   return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(port);
> 
> Together with the previous patch you now lose all MISSING_CASE/BUG/WARN
> for having an out-of-bounds/unsupported port. I kinda liked them.

MISSING_REG() to satisfy the typechecks would be good I think. Or
MISSING_CASE_REG().
-Danie
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to