On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 04:49:33PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
>> Depending on the VBT BDB version the maximum size
>> can be up to 38 bytes.
>>
>> This fix increases the maximum of the VBT expected size
>> from 33 bytes to 38 bytes and by doing so cures the kernel
>> hang on BSW box.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <[email protected]>
>
> We already have David's patch in -fixes, how does this relate? How does it
> blow up? Is this a regression? If so which commit created it? Where's the
> bugzilla link from QA?
There's no bugzilla link from QA because Mika found the bug and I told
him to just send the patch.
BR,
Jani.
> -Daniel
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h
>> index f7ad6a5..788463d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h
>> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ struct common_child_dev_config {
>> union child_device_config {
>> /* This one is safe to be used anywhere, but the code should still check
>> * the BDB version. */
>> - u8 raw[33];
>> + u8 raw[38];
>> /* This one should only be kept for legacy code. */
>> struct old_child_dev_config old;
>> /* This one should also be safe to use anywhere, even without version
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
