On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 04:39:16PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > index 8fe2fde..6188e94 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > @@ -308,7 +308,8 @@ static void hsw_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private > *dev_priv, > BIT(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_D_4_LANES) | \ > BIT(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT)) > #define SKL_DISPLAY_MISC_IO_POWER_DOMAINS ( \ > - SKL_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_1_POWER_DOMAINS) > + SKL_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_1_POWER_DOMAINS | \ > + BIT(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
Yep, with the current power domain design INIT domain should be everywhere. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > #define SKL_DISPLAY_ALWAYS_ON_POWER_DOMAINS ( \ > (POWER_DOMAIN_MASK & ~(SKL_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_1_POWER_DOMAINS | \ > SKL_DISPLAY_POWERWELL_2_POWER_DOMAINS | \ > -- > 2.1.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
