On 03/09/2015 09:55 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Since we use obj->active as a hint in many places throughout the code,
knowing its state in debugfs is extremely useful.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 042ad2fec484..809f6eadc10c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -123,8 +123,9 @@ describe_obj(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_i915_gem_object 
*obj)
        struct i915_vma *vma;
        int pin_count = 0;

-       seq_printf(m, "%pK: %s%s%s %8zdKiB %02x %02x %x %x %x%s%s%s",
+       seq_printf(m, "%pK: %s%s%s%s %8zdKiB %02x %02x %x %x %x%s%s%s",
                   &obj->base,
+                  obj->active ? "*" : " ",

%c etc would maybe be more compact code? (Hey I have to earn my bike-shedding badge somehow! ;) Anyway,

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>

This now completes the series apart from I think two respins - rebase for possible extra unpin and missing lrc destructor.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to