On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 05:10:08PM +0000, Michel Thierry wrote:
> From: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]>
>
> We have some fanciness coming up. This patch just breaks out the logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <[email protected]>
The next patch moves around this function again which means the diff is
actually bigger. Also an extracted function should actually replace the
logic that's extracted in the same patch. As-is this doesn't help review,
but I agree it's a nice split-up idea which would help review. Probably
got lost in all the rebases.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> index b67d269..a8ff03d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -726,6 +726,16 @@ unpin_out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static inline bool should_skip_switch(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> + struct intel_context *from,
> + struct intel_context *to)
> +{
> + if (from == to && !to->remap_slice)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * i915_switch_context() - perform a GPU context switch.
> * @ring: ring for which we'll execute the context switch
> --
> 2.1.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
