Keith Packard <[email protected]> writes:

> intel_flush flushes any pending acceleration operations to the
> hardware, just like intel_uxa_batch_submit does today except that it is
> not uxa-specific.

This seems like an obvious cleanup (and in one case a fix), and we ought
to even apply it right away as long as it still calls
intel_glamor_flush().  If it did, it gets:

Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>

even before we sort out the rest of the series.

Attachment: pgpFn0KaDE2O6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to