> > For clarity this can be written as > > > > nr_pages = min_t(unsigned long, > > folio_nr_pages(folio), page_count - i); > > nr_pages = min_t(unsigned long, nr_pages, max_pages); > > Do you think the min_array() is less clear? Let's see what others say.
min_array() is clear, it's the ((unsigned long[]) { ... }) that
iis nice and fancy but of difficult first read. But, as I said,
it can stay, I don't have a strong opinion, maybe I'd have done
the same.
Andi
