On Mon, 21 Apr 2025, "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Intel-gfx <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jani >> Nikula >> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2025 2:41 PM >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Cc: Nikula, Jani <[email protected]> >> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/display: pass struct intel_display to PCH >> macros >> >> Now that INTEL_PCH_TYPE() and HAS_PCH_*() macros are under display, and >> accept a struct intel_display pointer, use that instead of struct >> drm_i915_private pointer in display code. >> >> This is done naively by running: >> >> $ sed -i 's/\(INTEL_PCH_TYPE\|HAS_PCH_[A-Z0-9_-]*\)([^)]*)/\1(display)/g' \ >> $(find drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display -name "*.c") >> >> and fixing the fallout, i.e. removing unused local i915 variables and >> adding display variables where needed. >> >> v2: Rebase > > LGTM > > > Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <[email protected]>
Thanks for the reviews, series pushed to drm-intel-next. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
