On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:48:57PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > index 5f3666a..04d40fa 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > @@ -1785,10 +1785,26 @@ static void gen8_ppgtt_info(struct seq_file *m, > struct drm_device *dev, int verb > } > } > > +static size_t gen6_ppgtt_count_pt_pages(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt) > +{ > + struct i915_pagedir *pd = &ppgtt->pd; > + struct i915_pagetab **pt = &pd->page_tables[0]; > + size_t cnt = 0; > + int i;
How can the count be a size_t when cnt <= i and i is only an int? What was the reason for picking size_t here? Does that have far reaching implications? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
