> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hogander, Jouni <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2024 3:40 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Manna, Animesh <[email protected]>; Hogander, Jouni
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 06/21] drm/i915/psr: Check possible errors for panel
> replay as well
> 
> On HPD interrupt we want to check if the reason for HPD was some panel
> replay error detected by monitor/panel. This is already done for PSR. We
> want to do this for panel replay as well. Modify intel_psr_short_pulse to
> support panel replay as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 893c72ea8cf1..6d7ef74201d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -2959,6 +2959,13 @@ static void psr_capability_changed_check(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp)
>       }
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * On common bits:
> + * DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR ==
> DP_PANEL_REPLAY_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR
> + * DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR ==
> +DP_PANEL_REPLAY_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR
> + * DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR == DP_PANEL_REPLAY_LINK_CRC_ERROR
> + * this function is relying on PSR definitions  */
>  void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp); @@ -
> 2968,7 +2975,7 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>                         DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR |
>                         DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR;
> 
> -     if (!CAN_PSR(intel_dp))
> +     if (!CAN_PSR(intel_dp) && !CAN_PANEL_REPLAY(intel_dp))

I feel here the condition check would be:
        if (!(CAN_PSR(intel_dp) || CAN_PANEL_REPLAY(intel_dp)))
 
>               return;
> 
>       mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
> @@ -2982,12 +2989,14 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
>               goto exit;
>       }
> 
> -     if (status == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR || (error_status &
> errors)) {
> +     if ((!psr->panel_replay_enabled && status ==
> DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR) ||
> +         (error_status & errors)) {

This will check only for psr, rt? .. The flag panel_replay_enabled will be true 
and will not check for error status for panel-replay.

>               intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
>               psr->sink_not_reliable = true;
>       }
> 
> -     if (status == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR && !error_status)
> +     if (!psr->panel_replay_enabled && status ==
> DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR &&
> +         !error_status)

Same doubt as above.

Regards,
Animesh

>               drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
>                           "PSR sink internal error, disabling PSR\n");
>       if (error_status & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) @@ -3007,8
> +3016,10 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>       /* clear status register */
>       drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS,
> error_status);
> 
> -     psr_alpm_check(intel_dp);
> -     psr_capability_changed_check(intel_dp);
> +     if (!psr->panel_replay_enabled) {
> +             psr_alpm_check(intel_dp);
> +             psr_capability_changed_check(intel_dp);
> +     }
> 
>  exit:
>       mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> --
> 2.34.1

Reply via email to