On 7/29/2023 4:35 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
From: Yan Zhao <[email protected]>

Switch from the poorly named and flawed ->track_flush_slot() to the newly
introduced ->track_remove_region().  From KVMGT's perspective, the two
hooks are functionally equivalent, the only difference being that
->track_remove_region() is called only when KVM is 100% certain the
memory region will be removed, i.e. is invoked slightly later in KVM's
memslot modification flow.

Cc: Zhenyu Wang <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <[email protected]>
[sean: handle name change, massage changelog, rebase]
Tested-by: Yan Zhao <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 21 +++++++++------------
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 3ea3cb9eb599..3f2327455d85 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -108,9 +108,8 @@ struct gvt_dma {
static void kvmgt_page_track_write(gpa_t gpa, const u8 *val, int len,
                                   struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
-static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
-               struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
-               struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
+static void kvmgt_page_track_remove_region(gfn_t gfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
+                                          struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node 
*node);
static ssize_t intel_vgpu_show_description(struct mdev_type *mtype, char *buf)
  {
@@ -666,7 +665,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_open_device(struct vfio_device 
*vfio_dev)
                return -EEXIST;
vgpu->track_node.track_write = kvmgt_page_track_write;
-       vgpu->track_node.track_flush_slot = kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot;
+       vgpu->track_node.track_remove_region = kvmgt_page_track_remove_region;
        kvm_get_kvm(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm);
        kvm_page_track_register_notifier(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm,
                                         &vgpu->track_node);
@@ -1617,22 +1616,20 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_write(gpa_t gpa, const u8 
*val, int len,
        mutex_unlock(&info->vgpu_lock);
  }
-static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
-               struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
-               struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node)
+static void kvmgt_page_track_remove_region(gfn_t gfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
+                                          struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node 
*node)
  {
        unsigned long i;
-       gfn_t gfn;
        struct intel_vgpu *info =
                container_of(node, struct intel_vgpu, track_node);
mutex_lock(&info->vgpu_lock); - for (i = 0; i < slot->npages; i++) {
-               gfn = slot->base_gfn + i;
-               if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
-                       kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
+       for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
+               if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn + i))
+                       kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn + i);
        }
+
        mutex_unlock(&info->vgpu_lock);
  }
Reviewed-by: Zhi Wang <[email protected]>

Reply via email to