On Monday, 13 March 2023 11:30:45 CET Nirmoy Das wrote:
> debug_active_activate() expected ref->count to be zero
> which is not true anymore as __i915_active_activate() calls
> debug_active_activate() after incrementing the count.
> 
> v2: No need to check for "ref->count == 1" as __i915_active_activate()
> already make sure of that.
> 
> Fixes: 04240e30ed06 ("drm/i915: Skip taking acquire mutex for no ref->active 
> callback")
> Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andi Shyti <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: Janusz Krzysztofik <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]> # v5.10+
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> index a9fea115f2d2..8ef93889061a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> @@ -92,8 +92,7 @@ static void debug_active_init(struct i915_active *ref)
>  static void debug_active_activate(struct i915_active *ref)
>  {
>       lockdep_assert_held(&ref->tree_lock);
> -     if (!atomic_read(&ref->count)) /* before the first inc */
> -             debug_object_activate(ref, &active_debug_desc);
> +     debug_object_activate(ref, &active_debug_desc);
>  }
>  
>  static void debug_active_deactivate(struct i915_active *ref)
> 




Reply via email to