On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 04:51:10PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 09 Mar 2023, Dan Carpenter <erro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Jani Nikula, > > > > This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings. > > > > The patch 1b28c1c789d0: "drm/i915/dmc: add i915_to_dmc() and > > dmc->i915 and use them" from Mar 1, 2023, leads to the following > > Smatch complaint: > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c:1162 > > intel_dmc_debugfs_status_show() > > error: we previously assumed 'dmc' could be null (see line 1148) > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c > > 1142 > > 1143 wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm); > > 1144 > > 1145 seq_printf(m, "DMC initialized: %s\n", str_yes_no(dmc));' > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > This is a check for NULL too. > > > > 1146 seq_printf(m, "fw loaded: %s\n", > > 1147 str_yes_no(intel_dmc_has_payload(i915))); > > 1148 seq_printf(m, "path: %s\n", dmc ? dmc->fw_path : "N/A"); > > ^^^ > > The patch adds a check for NULL. > > > > 1149 seq_printf(m, "Pipe A fw needed: %s\n", > > 1150 str_yes_no(GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12)); > > 1151 seq_printf(m, "Pipe A fw loaded: %s\n", > > 1152 str_yes_no(has_dmc_id_fw(i915, > > DMC_FW_PIPEA))); > > 1153 seq_printf(m, "Pipe B fw needed: %s\n", > > 1154 str_yes_no(IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915) || > > 1155 DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)); > > 1156 seq_printf(m, "Pipe B fw loaded: %s\n", > > 1157 str_yes_no(has_dmc_id_fw(i915, > > DMC_FW_PIPEB))); > > 1158 > > 1159 if (!intel_dmc_has_payload(i915)) > > intel_dmc_has_payload() should always return false for dmc == NULL.
Ah, right. Sorry for the noise. I'm going to try figure out how to make Smatch parse this correctly. regards, dan carpenter
