On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:14:09PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On TGL+ the DSS control registers are at different offsets, and there's
> one per pipe. Fix the offsets to fix dual link DSI for TGL+.
> 
> There would be helpers for this in the DSC code, but just do the quick
> fix now for DSI. Long term, we should probably move all the DSS handling
> into intel_vdsc.c, so exporting the helpers seems counter-productive.

I'm not entirely happy with intel_vdsc.c since it handles
both the hardware VDSC block (which includes DSS, and so
also uncompressed joiner and MSO), and also some actual
DSC calculations/etc. Might be nice to have a cleaner
split of some sort.

That also reminds me that MSO+dsc/joiner is probably going
to fail miserably given that neither side knows about the
other and both poke the DSS registers.

> 
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8232
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
> index b5316715bb3b..5a17ab3f0d1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
> @@ -277,9 +277,21 @@ static void configure_dual_link_mode(struct 
> intel_encoder *encoder,
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
>       struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(encoder);
> +     i915_reg_t dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl2_reg;
>       u32 dss_ctl1;
>  
> -     dss_ctl1 = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DSS_CTL1);
> +     /* FIXME: Move all DSS handling to intel_vdsc.c */
> +     if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> +             struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(pipe_config->uapi.crtc);
> +
> +             dss_ctl1_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(crtc->pipe);
> +             dss_ctl2_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL2(crtc->pipe);
> +     } else {
> +             dss_ctl1_reg = DSS_CTL1;
> +             dss_ctl2_reg = DSS_CTL2;
> +     }
> +
> +     dss_ctl1 = intel_de_read(dev_priv, dss_ctl1_reg);

Side note: should get rid of this rmw to make sure the thing
fully configuerd the way we want...

Anyways, this seems fine for now:
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

>       dss_ctl1 |= SPLITTER_ENABLE;
>       dss_ctl1 &= ~OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK;
>       dss_ctl1 |= OVERLAP_PIXELS(intel_dsi->pixel_overlap);
> @@ -299,14 +311,14 @@ static void configure_dual_link_mode(struct 
> intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>               dss_ctl1 &= ~LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK;
>               dss_ctl1 |= LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth);
> -             intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DSS_CTL2, RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK,
> +             intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, dss_ctl2_reg, 
> RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK,
>                            RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth));
>       } else {
>               /* Interleave */
>               dss_ctl1 |= DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE;
>       }
>  
> -     intel_de_write(dev_priv, DSS_CTL1, dss_ctl1);
> +     intel_de_write(dev_priv, dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl1);
>  }
>  
>  /* aka DSI 8X clock */
> -- 
> 2.39.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to