On 1/25/2023 4:10 PM, Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi Nirmoy,

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:00:03AM +0100, Nirmoy Das wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>

We want to idle all tiles when exiting selftests.

Cc: Matt Roper <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]>
except from the tag list and the title I guess this is the same
patch as the previous one, right? Can you please add some
versioning next time?

I wasn't sure if I should add v2 for the title change.

If it's the same this patch then it's good to be pushed. Just a
little failure that is independent from this change.

BTW, why is there a "mtl" prfix in the title while in the
previous version it was "xehpsdv"? I can understand the latter
because originally xehpsdv was a synonymous with multi-gt. But
it's not the case anymore. If you don't mind I would remove it
before pushing.

This confusion is because I didn't do the versioning properly :/ Sorry about
that.

Matt clarified in the v1 that we haven't enabled multi-tile for xehp, only
for MTL we have multi-tile

enabled. I actually tested this on MTL.


Do you want me to resend with a added  "v2: fix the title as we only support
multi-tile for MTL now(Matt)" ?
no need, I'll remove the mtl part. I think the title identifies
only the file path.

Fine with me. Thanks Andi!


Nirmoy


As we are at it, I have some patches for adding multitile to
xehpdv, but I'm not sure we want them. Any opinion? Matt? Tvrtko?

Andi

Regards,

Nirmoy

Andi

---
   .../gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_flush_test.c   | 28 +++++++++++--------
   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_flush_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_flush_test.c
index b484e12df417..29110abb4fe0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_flush_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_flush_test.c
@@ -14,21 +14,27 @@
   int igt_flush_test(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
   {
-       struct intel_gt *gt = to_gt(i915);
-       int ret = intel_gt_is_wedged(gt) ? -EIO : 0;
+       struct intel_gt *gt;
+       unsigned int i;
+       int ret = 0;
-       cond_resched();
+       for_each_gt(gt, i915, i) {
+               if (intel_gt_is_wedged(gt))
+                       ret = -EIO;
-       if (intel_gt_wait_for_idle(gt, HZ * 3) == -ETIME) {
-               pr_err("%pS timed out, cancelling all further testing.\n",
-                      __builtin_return_address(0));
+               cond_resched();
-               GEM_TRACE("%pS timed out.\n",
-                         __builtin_return_address(0));
-               GEM_TRACE_DUMP();
+               if (intel_gt_wait_for_idle(gt, HZ * 3) == -ETIME) {
+                       pr_err("%pS timed out, cancelling all further 
testing.\n",
+                              __builtin_return_address(0));
-               intel_gt_set_wedged(gt);
-               ret = -EIO;
+                       GEM_TRACE("%pS timed out.\n",
+                                 __builtin_return_address(0));
+                       GEM_TRACE_DUMP();
+
+                       intel_gt_set_wedged(gt);
+                       ret = -EIO;
+               }
        }
        return ret;
--
2.39.0

Reply via email to