On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:37:56PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> This patch replaces all occurences of the form
> intel_uncore_write(reg, intel_uncore_read(reg) OP val)
> with intel_uncore_rmw.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <[email protected]>
> ---
> Apparently I have missed this pattern during refactoring.
> 
> Regards
> Andrzej
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c |   4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c     | 190 ++++++++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> index fc23c562d9b2a7..070005dd0da476 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> @@ -625,9 +625,7 @@ static void gen5_rps_disable(struct intel_rps *rps)
>       rgvswctl = intel_uncore_read16(uncore, MEMSWCTL);
>  
>       /* Ack interrupts, disable EFC interrupt */
> -     intel_uncore_write(uncore, MEMINTREN,
> -                        intel_uncore_read(uncore, MEMINTREN) &
> -                        ~MEMINT_EVAL_CHG_EN);
> +     intel_uncore_rmw(uncore, MEMINTREN, MEMINT_EVAL_CHG_EN, 0);
>       intel_uncore_write(uncore, MEMINTRSTS, MEMINT_EVAL_CHG);
>  
>       /* Go back to the starting frequency */

Maybe split the gt stuff to a separate patch?

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 19d4a88184d7a1..4d264147ada94b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
<snip>
> @@ -4293,14 +4272,12 @@ static void lpt_init_clock_gating(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>        * disabled when not needed anymore in order to save power.
>        */
>       if (HAS_PCH_LPT_LP(dev_priv))
> -             intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, SOUTH_DSPCLK_GATE_D,
> -                        intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, 
> SOUTH_DSPCLK_GATE_D) |
> -                        PCH_LP_PARTITION_LEVEL_DISABLE);
> +             intel_uncore_rmw(&dev_priv->uncore, SOUTH_DSPCLK_GATE_D, 0,
                                                                        ^

I'd put the newline there in these cases. That way everything we're
doing to the register value would be neatly on the same line instead
of spread around like this.

> +                              PCH_LP_PARTITION_LEVEL_DISABLE);
>  
>       /* WADPOClockGatingDisable:hsw */
> -     intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, TRANS_CHICKEN1(PIPE_A),
> -                intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, TRANS_CHICKEN1(PIPE_A)) 
> |
> -                TRANS_CHICKEN1_DP0UNIT_GC_DISABLE);
> +     intel_uncore_rmw(&dev_priv->uncore, TRANS_CHICKEN1(PIPE_A), 0,
> +                      TRANS_CHICKEN1_DP0UNIT_GC_DISABLE);
>  }
>  
>  static void lpt_suspend_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
<snip>
> @@ -4532,43 +4494,37 @@ static void bdw_init_clock_gating(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       enum pipe pipe;
>  
>       /* WaFbcAsynchFlipDisableFbcQueue:hsw,bdw */
> -     intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, CHICKEN_PIPESL_1(PIPE_A),
> -                intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, 
> CHICKEN_PIPESL_1(PIPE_A)) |
> -                HSW_FBCQ_DIS);
> +     intel_uncore_rmw(&dev_priv->uncore, CHICKEN_PIPESL_1(PIPE_A), 0, 
> HSW_FBCQ_DIS);
>  
>       /* WaSwitchSolVfFArbitrationPriority:bdw */
> -     intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, GAM_ECOCHK, 
> intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, GAM_ECOCHK) | HSW_ECOCHK_ARB_PRIO_SOL);
> +     intel_uncore_rmw(&dev_priv->uncore, GAM_ECOCHK, 0, 
> HSW_ECOCHK_ARB_PRIO_SOL);
>  
>       /* WaPsrDPAMaskVBlankInSRD:bdw */
> -     intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, CHICKEN_PAR1_1,
> -                intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, CHICKEN_PAR1_1) | 
> DPA_MASK_VBLANK_SRD);
> +     intel_uncore_rmw(&dev_priv->uncore, CHICKEN_PAR1_1, 0, 
> DPA_MASK_VBLANK_SRD);
>  
>       for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
>               /* WaPsrDPRSUnmaskVBlankInSRD:bdw */
> -             intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, CHICKEN_PIPESL_1(pipe),
> -                        intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, 
> CHICKEN_PIPESL_1(pipe)) |
> -                        BDW_DPRS_MASK_VBLANK_SRD);
> +             intel_uncore_rmw(&dev_priv->uncore, CHICKEN_PIPESL_1(pipe), 0,
> +                              BDW_DPRS_MASK_VBLANK_SRD);
>       }
>  
>       /* WaVSRefCountFullforceMissDisable:bdw */
>       /* WaDSRefCountFullforceMissDisable:bdw */
> -     intel_uncore_write(&dev_priv->uncore, GEN7_FF_THREAD_MODE,
> -                intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, GEN7_FF_THREAD_MODE) &
> -                ~(GEN8_FF_DS_REF_CNT_FFME | GEN7_FF_VS_REF_CNT_FFME));
> +     intel_uncore_rmw(&dev_priv->uncore, GEN7_FF_THREAD_MODE,
> +                      (GEN8_FF_DS_REF_CNT_FFME | GEN7_FF_VS_REF_CNT_FFME), 
> 0);

Useless parens there. Ditto in the other copy.

This stuff really doesn't belong here anyway. I thought someone would have
hoisted all the gt stuff into a more appropriate place by now. But I guess
not.

Rest of the patch looked ok to me.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to