>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
>Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2022 3:28 PM
>To: David Airlie <[email protected]>; Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>;
>Gurchetan Singh <[email protected]>; Chia-I Wu
><[email protected]>; Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>; Daniel Almeida
><[email protected]>; Gert Wollny <[email protected]>;
>Gustavo Padovan <[email protected]>; Daniel Stone
><[email protected]>; Tomeu Vizoso <[email protected]>;
>Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>; Maxime Ripard
><[email protected]>; Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>;
>Rob Clark <[email protected]>; Sumit Semwal
><[email protected]>; Christian König <[email protected]>;
>Pan, Xinhui <[email protected]>; Thierry Reding
><[email protected]>; Tomasz Figa <[email protected]>; Marek
>Szyprowski <[email protected]>; Mauro Carvalho Chehab
><[email protected]>; Alex Deucher <[email protected]>; Jani
>Nikula <[email protected]>; Joonas Lahtinen
><[email protected]>; Vivi, Rodrigo <[email protected]>;
>Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>; Thomas Hellström
><[email protected]>; Qiang Yu <[email protected]>; Srinivas
>Kandagatla <[email protected]>; Amol Maheshwari
><[email protected]>; Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>; Leon
>Romanovsky <[email protected]>; Gross, Jurgen <[email protected]>; Stefano
>Stabellini <[email protected]>; Oleksandr Tyshchenko
><[email protected]>; Tomi Valkeinen <[email protected]>;
>Russell King <[email protected]>; Lucas Stach <[email protected]>;
>Christian Gmeiner <[email protected]>; Ruhl, Michael J
><[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Dmitry
>Osipenko <[email protected]>; [email protected]; linaro-mm-
>[email protected]; [email protected]; intel-
>[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
>foundation.org; [email protected]; linux-arm-
>[email protected]
>Subject: [PATCH v5 06/21] drm/i915: Prepare to dynamic dma-buf locking
>specification
>
>Prepare i915 driver to the common dynamic dma-buf locking convention
>by starting to use the unlocked versions of dma-buf API functions
>and handling cases where importer now holds the reservation lock.
>
>Acked-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
>Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c       |  2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c       | 14 ++++++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>index f5062d0c6333..07eee1c09aaf 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int i915_gem_dmabuf_vmap(struct dma_buf
>*dma_buf,
>       struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = dma_buf_to_obj(dma_buf);
>       void *vaddr;
>
>-      vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(obj, I915_MAP_WB);
>+      vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, I915_MAP_WB);
>       if (IS_ERR(vaddr))
>               return PTR_ERR(vaddr);
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
>index 85482a04d158..7cab89618bad 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
>@@ -290,7 +290,21 @@ void __i915_gem_object_pages_fini(struct
>drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>       __i915_gem_object_free_mmaps(obj);
>
>       atomic_set(&obj->mm.pages_pin_count, 0);
>+
>+      /*
>+       * dma_buf_unmap_attachment() requires reservation to be
>+       * locked. The imported GEM shouldn't share reservation lock
>+       * and ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use() shouldn't be invoked for
>+       * dma-buf, so it's safe to take the lock.
>+       */
>+      if (obj->base.import_attach)
>+              i915_gem_object_lock(obj, NULL);
>+
>       __i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj);
>+
>+      if (obj->base.import_attach)
>+              i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
>+
>       GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj));
> }

Hi Dmitry,

I think that this looks correct and reasonable.

Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <[email protected]>

m

>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>index 51ed824b020c..f2f3cfad807b 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int igt_dmabuf_import_same_driver(struct
>drm_i915_private *i915,
>               goto out_import;
>       }
>
>-      st = dma_buf_map_attachment(import_attach,
>DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>+      st = dma_buf_map_attachment_unlocked(import_attach,
>DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>       if (IS_ERR(st)) {
>               err = PTR_ERR(st);
>               goto out_detach;
>@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int igt_dmabuf_import_same_driver(struct
>drm_i915_private *i915,
>               timeout = -ETIME;
>       }
>       err = timeout > 0 ? 0 : timeout;
>-      dma_buf_unmap_attachment(import_attach, st,
>DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>+      dma_buf_unmap_attachment_unlocked(import_attach, st,
>DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> out_detach:
>       dma_buf_detach(dmabuf, import_attach);
> out_import:
>@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int igt_dmabuf_import(void *arg)
>               goto out_obj;
>       }
>
>-      err = dma_buf_vmap(dmabuf, &map);
>+      err = dma_buf_vmap_unlocked(dmabuf, &map);
>       dma_map = err ? NULL : map.vaddr;
>       if (!dma_map) {
>               pr_err("dma_buf_vmap failed\n");
>@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int igt_dmabuf_import(void *arg)
>
>       err = 0;
> out_dma_map:
>-      dma_buf_vunmap(dmabuf, &map);
>+      dma_buf_vunmap_unlocked(dmabuf, &map);
> out_obj:
>       i915_gem_object_put(obj);
> out_dmabuf:
>@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static int igt_dmabuf_import_ownership(void *arg)
>       if (IS_ERR(dmabuf))
>               return PTR_ERR(dmabuf);
>
>-      err = dma_buf_vmap(dmabuf, &map);
>+      err = dma_buf_vmap_unlocked(dmabuf, &map);
>       ptr = err ? NULL : map.vaddr;
>       if (!ptr) {
>               pr_err("dma_buf_vmap failed\n");
>@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static int igt_dmabuf_import_ownership(void *arg)
>       }
>
>       memset(ptr, 0xc5, PAGE_SIZE);
>-      dma_buf_vunmap(dmabuf, &map);
>+      dma_buf_vunmap_unlocked(dmabuf, &map);
>
>       obj = to_intel_bo(i915_gem_prime_import(&i915->drm, dmabuf));
>       if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
>@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static int igt_dmabuf_export_vmap(void *arg)
>       }
>       i915_gem_object_put(obj);
>
>-      err = dma_buf_vmap(dmabuf, &map);
>+      err = dma_buf_vmap_unlocked(dmabuf, &map);
>       ptr = err ? NULL : map.vaddr;
>       if (!ptr) {
>               pr_err("dma_buf_vmap failed\n");
>@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static int igt_dmabuf_export_vmap(void *arg)
>       memset(ptr, 0xc5, dmabuf->size);
>
>       err = 0;
>-      dma_buf_vunmap(dmabuf, &map);
>+      dma_buf_vunmap_unlocked(dmabuf, &map);
> out:
>       dma_buf_put(dmabuf);
>       return err;
>--
>2.37.3

Reply via email to