> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Rodrigo
> Vivi
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 8:53 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <[email protected]>; Daniel Vetter
> <[email protected]>; David Weinehall <[email protected]>;
> Tangudu, Tilak <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Reduce autosuspend
> delay to 1s.
>
> Let's try to be more aggressive on the power savings, but not as much as 0.1s
> that caused us some regression in the past.
In IGT we are already using 0 second as auto suspend delay.
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <[email protected]>
>
> Also let's have this in a separated patch so that can be bisected and
> increased
> back (or reverted) as needed.
>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> Cc: David Weinehall <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tilak Tangudu <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 8f052bd4f58c..3244ac85d13c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_runtime_pm
> *rpm)
> */
> dev_pm_set_driver_flags(kdev, DPM_FLAG_NO_DIRECT_COMPLETE);
>
> - pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(kdev, 10000); /* 10s */
> + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(kdev, 1000); /* 1s */
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(kdev);
>
> /*
> --
> 2.31.1
