On 6/18/21 12:26 PM, Patchwork wrote:
Project List - Patchwork *Patch Details*
*Series:* drm/i915/ttm: Fix incorrect assumptions about
ttm_bo_validate() semantics
*URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91661/
<https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91661/>
*State:* failure
*Details:*
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20407/index.html
<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20407/index.html>
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10242_full -> Patchwork_20407_full
Summary
*FAILURE*
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20407_full absolutely
need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_20407_full, please notify your bug team to
allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives
in CI.
Possible new issues
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
Patchwork_20407_full:
IGT changes
Possible regressions
*
igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wide-active@vcs1:
o shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> FAIL
<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20407/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_reloc@[email protected]>
*
igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-8bpp-rotate-0:
o shard-glk: PASS
<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10242/shard-glk3/igt@[email protected]>
-> FAIL
<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20407/shard-glk1/igt@[email protected]>
Failures not related AFAICT.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
