From: Matt Roper <[email protected]>
Let's start preparing for upcoming platforms that will use an XE_LPD
design.
v2:
- Use the now-preferred "XE_LPD" term to refer to this design
- Utilize DISPLAY_VER() rather than a feature flag
- Drop unused mbus_size field (Lucas)
v3:
- Adjust for dbuf.{size,slice_mask} (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]> (v2)
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
index f3ca5d5c97781..acf47252d9e75 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
@@ -380,6 +380,8 @@ intel_display_power_put_all_in_set(struct drm_i915_private
*i915,
enum dbuf_slice {
DBUF_S1,
DBUF_S2,
+ DBUF_S3,
+ DBUF_S4,
I915_MAX_DBUF_SLICES
};
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index c678e0663d808..00e15fe00f4f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@ -939,6 +939,16 @@ static const struct intel_device_info adl_s_info = {
.dma_mask_size = 46,
};
+#define XE_LPD_FEATURES \
+ .display.ver = 13, \
+ .display.has_psr_hw_tracking = 0, \
+ .abox_mask = GENMASK(1, 0), \
+ .pipe_mask = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_C) | BIT(PIPE_D), \
+ .cpu_transcoder_mask = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) | BIT(TRANSCODER_B) | \
+ BIT(TRANSCODER_C) | BIT(TRANSCODER_D), \
+ .dbuf.size = 4096, \
+ .dbuf.slice_mask = BIT(DBUF_S1) | BIT(DBUF_S2) | BIT(DBUF_S3) |
BIT(DBUF_S4)
+
#undef GEN
#undef PLATFORM
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
