From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

We try to set no_fbc_reason when FBC is not possible, let's
consistently clear when activating FBC.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
index 4968e79a6235..fb8c0872a2b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
@@ -411,6 +411,17 @@ bool intel_fbc_is_active(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
        return dev_priv->fbc.active;
 }
 
+static void intel_fbc_activate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+       struct intel_fbc *fbc = &dev_priv->fbc;
+
+       drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !mutex_is_locked(&fbc->lock));
+
+       intel_fbc_hw_activate(dev_priv);
+
+       fbc->no_fbc_reason = NULL;
+}
+
 static void intel_fbc_deactivate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                                 const char *reason)
 {
@@ -1094,7 +1105,7 @@ static void __intel_fbc_post_update(struct intel_crtc 
*crtc)
                return;
 
        if (!fbc->busy_bits)
-               intel_fbc_hw_activate(dev_priv);
+               intel_fbc_activate(dev_priv);
        else
                intel_fbc_deactivate(dev_priv, "frontbuffer write");
 }
-- 
2.26.3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to