On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Matt Roper <[email protected]> wrote: > Let's start preparing for upcoming platforms that will use an XE_LPD > design. > > v2: > - Use the now-preferred "XE_LPD" term to refer to this design > - Utilize DISPLAY_VER() rather than a feature flag > - Drop unused mbus_size field (Lucas) > > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c > index 5bfd94e2cc6f..3f06502e1d85 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c > @@ -936,6 +936,16 @@ static const struct intel_device_info adl_s_info = { > .dma_mask_size = 46, > }; > > +#define XE_LPD_FEATURES \ > + .display_ver = 13, \
I guess this begs the question why .display_ver and not .display.version, if we want to keep the display substruct. Side note, a lot of the stuff below should be moved under display too, but that's for another series. BR, Jani. > + .display.has_psr_hw_tracking = 0, \ > + .abox_mask = GENMASK(1, 0), \ > + .pipe_mask = BIT(PIPE_A) | BIT(PIPE_B) | BIT(PIPE_C) | BIT(PIPE_D), \ > + .cpu_transcoder_mask = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) | BIT(TRANSCODER_B) | \ > + BIT(TRANSCODER_C) | BIT(TRANSCODER_D), \ > + .ddb_size = 4096, \ > + .num_supported_dbuf_slices = 4 > + > #undef GEN > #undef PLATFORM -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
