On 14/12/2020 10:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
RC6 should work before suspend, and continue to increment while idle
after suspend. Should.

v2: Include a longer sleep after suspend; it appears we are reticent to
idle so soon after waking up.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
  tests/i915/perf_pmu.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
index cb7273142..0b470c1bc 100644
--- a/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/i915/perf_pmu.c
@@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ static unsigned int measured_usleep(unsigned int usec)
  #define TEST_RUNTIME_PM (8)
  #define FLAG_LONG (16)
  #define FLAG_HANG (32)
+#define TEST_S3 (64)
static igt_spin_t * __spin_poll(int fd, uint32_t ctx,
                                const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
@@ -1578,7 +1579,7 @@ test_frequency_idle(int gem_fd)
                     "Actual frequency should be 0 while parked!\n");
  }
-static bool wait_for_rc6(int fd)
+static bool wait_for_rc6(int fd, int timeout)
  {
        struct timespec tv = {};
        uint64_t start, now;
@@ -1594,7 +1595,7 @@ static bool wait_for_rc6(int fd)
                now = pmu_read_single(fd);
                if (now - start > 1e6)
                        return true;
-       } while (!igt_seconds_elapsed(&tv));
+       } while (igt_seconds_elapsed(&tv) <= timeout);
return false;
  }
@@ -1636,14 +1637,32 @@ test_rc6(int gem_fd, unsigned int flags)
                }
        }
- igt_require(wait_for_rc6(fd));
+       igt_require(wait_for_rc6(fd, 1));
/* While idle check full RC6. */
        prev = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[0]);
        slept = measured_usleep(duration_ns / 1000);
        idle = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[1]);
+
        igt_debug("slept=%lu perf=%"PRIu64"\n", slept, ts[1] - ts[0]);
+       assert_within_epsilon(idle - prev, ts[1] - ts[0], tolerance);
+
+       if (flags & TEST_S3) {
+               prev = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[0]);
+               igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM,
+                                             SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
+               idle = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[1]);
+               igt_debug("suspend=%"PRIu64"\n", ts[1] - ts[0]);
+               //assert_within_epsilon(idle - prev, ts[1] - ts[0], tolerance);
+       }
+
+       igt_assert(wait_for_rc6(fd, 5));
+ prev = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[0]);
+       slept = measured_usleep(duration_ns / 1000);
+       idle = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[1]);
+
+       igt_debug("slept=%lu perf=%"PRIu64"\n", slept, ts[1] - ts[0]);

You plan to leave the C++ bit commented out above and just check it here? Doesn't seem it harms to check twice in the non-S3 case anyway, just asking.

Regards,

Tvrtko

        assert_within_epsilon(idle - prev, ts[1] - ts[0], tolerance);
/* Wake up device and check no RC6. */
@@ -2245,6 +2264,9 @@ igt_main
        igt_subtest("rc6-runtime-pm-long")
                test_rc6(fd, TEST_RUNTIME_PM | FLAG_LONG);
+ igt_subtest("rc6-suspend")
+               test_rc6(fd, TEST_S3);
+
        /**
         * Check render nodes are counted.
         */

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to