On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:00:01PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> In order to do this for all VMs, it's convenient to rework the logic a
> bit. This should have no functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]>
I didn't read ahead but I guess the actual shrink code here will move to
the unbound list like the count code beforehand? Just for symmetry I think
that'd be worth it. Patch applied since it looks neater ;-)
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 3aaf875..3ce9d0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1693,9 +1693,14 @@ __i915_gem_shrink(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> long target,
> }
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, next, &vm->inactive_list, mm_list) {
> - if ((i915_gem_object_is_purgeable(obj) || !purgeable_only) &&
> - i915_gem_object_unbind(obj) == 0 &&
> - i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj) == 0) {
> +
> + if (!i915_gem_object_is_purgeable(obj) && purgeable_only)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (i915_gem_object_unbind(obj))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!i915_gem_object_put_pages(obj)) {
> count += obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> if (count >= target)
> return count;
> --
> 1.8.3.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
