On 9/25/2020 4:26 PM, [email protected] wrote:
From: John Harrison <[email protected]>

Was hitting null pointers and similar issues when running various
module load/unload and inject failure type tests. So clear those
pointers down when the objects have been de-allocated.

Had a quick chat with John about the incorrect pointer access, since the cleanup wouldn't fix the fact we're accessing a pointer after the relevant object was deallocated. None of the errors he hit are actually in the tree at the moment, the cleanup is just to make the errors slightly clearer in case we accidentally introduce new ones.
With a reworded commit message to better explain the above:

Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <[email protected]>

Daniele

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c | 1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c  | 1 +
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
index 7950d28beb8c..5212ff844292 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ int intel_guc_ads_create(struct intel_guc *guc)
  void intel_guc_ads_destroy(struct intel_guc *guc)
  {
        i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&guc->ads_vma, I915_VMA_RELEASE_MAP);
+       guc->ads_blob = NULL;
  }
static void guc_ads_private_data_reset(struct intel_guc *guc)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
index 11742fca0e9e..fa9e048cc65f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ void intel_guc_ct_fini(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
        GEM_BUG_ON(ct->enabled);
i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&ct->vma, I915_VMA_RELEASE_MAP);
+       memset(ct, 0, sizeof(*ct));
  }
/**

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to