On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:45:23AM +0300, Lionel Landwerlin wrote: > On 20/08/2020 20:26, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Use PRI[du]64 as necessary for 32bit builds. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <[email protected]> >
Was this for just 1/4 or the whole series? This one is for the whole series: Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <[email protected]> > > Thanks! > > -Lionel > > > --- > > tests/i915/perf.c | 8 ++++---- > > tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tests/i915/perf.c b/tests/i915/perf.c > > index 92edc9f1f..a894fd382 100644 > > --- a/tests/i915/perf.c > > +++ b/tests/i915/perf.c > > @@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ test_blocking(uint64_t requested_oa_period, bool > > set_kernel_hrtimer, uint64_t ke > > user_ns = (end_times.tms_utime - start_times.tms_utime) * tick_ns; > > kernel_ns = (end_times.tms_stime - start_times.tms_stime) * tick_ns; > > - igt_debug("%d blocking reads during test with %lu Hz OA sampling > > (expect no more than %d)\n", > > + igt_debug("%d blocking reads during test with %"PRIu64" Hz OA sampling > > (expect no more than %d)\n", > > n, NSEC_PER_SEC / oa_period, max_iterations); > > igt_debug("%d extra iterations seen, not related to periodic sampling > > (e.g. context switches)\n", > > n_extra_iterations); > > @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ test_polling(uint64_t requested_oa_period, bool > > set_kernel_hrtimer, uint64_t ker > > user_ns = (end_times.tms_utime - start_times.tms_utime) * tick_ns; > > kernel_ns = (end_times.tms_stime - start_times.tms_stime) * tick_ns; > > - igt_debug("%d non-blocking reads during test with %lu Hz OA sampling > > (expect no more than %d)\n", > > + igt_debug("%d non-blocking reads during test with %"PRIu64" Hz OA > > sampling (expect no more than %d)\n", > > n, NSEC_PER_SEC / oa_period, max_iterations); > > igt_debug("%d extra iterations seen, not related to periodic sampling > > (e.g. context switches)\n", > > n_extra_iterations); > > @@ -2357,7 +2357,7 @@ num_valid_reports_captured(struct > > drm_i915_perf_open_param *param, > > int64_t start, end; > > int num_reports = 0; > > - igt_debug("Expected duration = %lu\n", *duration_ns); > > + igt_debug("Expected duration = %"PRId64"\n", *duration_ns); > > stream_fd = __perf_open(drm_fd, param, true); > > @@ -2389,7 +2389,7 @@ num_valid_reports_captured(struct > > drm_i915_perf_open_param *param, > > *duration_ns = end - start; > > - igt_debug("Actual duration = %lu\n", *duration_ns); > > + igt_debug("Actual duration = %"PRIu64"\n", *duration_ns); > > return num_reports; > > } > > diff --git a/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c > > b/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c > > index 7671f39b4..adc41c29f 100644 > > --- a/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c > > +++ b/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c > > @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) > > } > > ctx.oa_exponent = oa_exponent_for_period(ctx.timestamp_frequency, > > perf_period); > > - fprintf(stdout, "Opening perf stream with metric_id=%lu > > oa_exponent=%u\n", > > + fprintf(stdout, "Opening perf stream with metric_id=%"PRIu64" > > oa_exponent=%u\n", > > ctx.metric_set->perf_oa_metrics_set, ctx.oa_exponent); > > ctx.perf_fd = perf_open(&ctx); > > > _______________________________________________ > igt-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
