Op 03-07-2020 om 15:43 schreef Tvrtko Ursulin: > > On 03/07/2020 13:22, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Execbuffer submission will perform its own WW locking, and we >> cannot rely on the implicit lock there. >> >> This also makes it clear that the GVT code will get a lockdep splat when >> multiple batchbuffer shadows need to be performed in the same instance, >> fix that up. >> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> > > You have my r-b for this one from the previous round. Thank you, will add. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/23] drm/i915: Revert relocation ch... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/23] drm/i915: Make sure execbuffer... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/23] drm/i915: Add ww locking to vm... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/23] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pi... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/23] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_obj... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: Nuke arguments to eb... Maarten Lankhorst
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: Nuke argume... Tvrtko Ursulin
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Spl... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/23] drm/i915: Remove locking from ... Maarten Lankhorst
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/23] drm/i915: Remove lock... Tvrtko Ursulin
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/23] drm/i915: Remove ... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Asy... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/23] drm/i915: Use ww pinning for i... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/23] drm/i915: Convert i915_perf to... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/23] drm/i915: Pin engine before pi... Maarten Lankhorst
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Us... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Use ww... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Use ww lo... Patchwork
