On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 12:27:42PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 09:24:50PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Currently we claim to use TPS7 when using TPS4. That is just
> > confusing, so let's fix the debug print.
> > 
> > And while we're touching this let's add the customary
> > encoder id/name as well.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > index 5ac182357fc9..eba97b1f5839 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -4353,17 +4353,33 @@ void intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp 
> > *intel_dp)
> >     intel_dp->set_signal_levels(intel_dp);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static char dp_training_pattern_name(u8 train_pat)
> > +{
> > +   switch (train_pat) {
> > +   case DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_1:
> > +   case DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_2:
> > +   case DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_3:
> > +           return '0' + train_pat;
> > +   case DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_4:
> > +           return '4';
> > +   default:
> > +           return '?';
> 
> Shouldnt this be a WARN? If we just return a ? it might result into failure 
> without any warn

Only if decide that this functions's purpose is to validate the rest of
the code isn't broken and using bogus training patterns.

> 
> Other than that I like that now it will say TPS4 instead of misleading TPS7
> So with a default WARN,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <[email protected]>
> 
> Manasi
> 
> > +   }
> > +}
> > +
> >  void
> >  intel_dp_program_link_training_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >                                    u8 dp_train_pat)
> >  {
> > -   struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > -   u8 train_pat_mask = drm_dp_training_pattern_mask(intel_dp->dpcd);
> > +   struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
> > +   struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> > +   u8 train_pat = dp_train_pat & 
> > drm_dp_training_pattern_mask(intel_dp->dpcd);
> >  
> > -   if (dp_train_pat & train_pat_mask)
> > +   if (train_pat)
> >             drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > -                       "Using DP training pattern TPS%d\n",
> > -                       dp_train_pat & train_pat_mask);
> > +                       "[ENCODER:%d:%s] Using DP training pattern TPS%c\n",
> > +                       encoder->base.base.id, encoder->base.name,
> > +                       dp_training_pattern_name(train_pat));
> >  
> >     intel_dp->set_link_train(intel_dp, dp_train_pat);
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 2.26.2
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to