On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 02:15:17PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> Although RKL is a gen12 platform, it doesn't have the two extra
> instances of the ABOX control register; we should only program
> the single MBUS_ABOX_CTL on this platform.
> 
> Bspec: 50096
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 2c1ce50b572b..37847b3d733c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -4772,7 +4772,7 @@ static void icl_mbus_init(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>               MBUS_ABOX_BW_CREDIT(1);
>  
>       intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX_CTL, mask, val);
> -     if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> +     if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12 && !IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
>               intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX1_CTL, mask, val);
>               intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MBUS_ABOX2_CTL, mask, val);
>       }

Can't find anyting definitive in bspec, so not 100% sure but
since you say it gives unclaim reg errors it seems correct.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

Though I think I'd like to see that HAS_ABOX() thing I suggested
and use it here as well.

> -- 
> 2.24.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to