Chris Wilson <[email protected]> writes: > Give a small bump for our tolerance on comparing the expected vs > measured clock ticks/time from 10% to 12.5% to accommodate a bad result > on Sandybridge that was off by 10.3%. Hopefully, that is the worst we > will see. > > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1802 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
12.5% of something is much better than 100% of nothing Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c > index 181b29fa5b58..48f954ac4f2c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c > @@ -312,15 +312,15 @@ int live_rps_clock_interval(void *arg) > engine->name, cycles, time, ktime_to_ns(dt), > expected, > gt->clock_frequency / 1000); > > - if (10 * time < 9 * ktime_to_ns(dt) || > - 10 * time > 11 * ktime_to_ns(dt)) { > + if (10 * time < 8 * ktime_to_ns(dt) || > + 8 * time > 10 * ktime_to_ns(dt)) { > pr_err("%s: rps clock time does not match > walltime!\n", > engine->name); > err = -EINVAL; > } > > - if (10 * expected < 9 * cycles || > - 10 * expected > 11 * cycles) { > + if (10 * expected < 8 * cycles || > + 8 * expected > 10 * cycles) { > pr_err("%s: walltime does not match rps clock > ticks!\n", > engine->name); > err = -EINVAL; > -- > 2.20.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
