Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-03-30 17:07:34) > Chris Wilson <[email protected]> writes: > > > Allow some users the discretion to not immediately return on a normal > > signal. Hopefully, they will opt to use TASK_KILLABLE instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 6 ++++-- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h | 6 +++++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c | 10 +++++----- > > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c > > index a0d31f7bfb42..7b685032cc1e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c > > @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int flush_lazy_signals(struct i915_active *ref) > > return err; > > } > > > > -int i915_active_wait(struct i915_active *ref) > > +int __i915_active_wait(struct i915_active *ref, int state) > > { > > int err; > > minor gripe: s/state/task_state
set_current_state() signal_pending_state() All locals refer to it as state :) -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
