On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 04:35:57PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Harmonise the completion logic between the non-blocking and normal > > wait_rendering paths, and move that logic into a common function. > > > > In the process, we note that the last_write_seqno is by definition the > > earlier of the two read/write seqnos and so all successful waits will > > have passed the last_write_seqno. Therefore we can unconditionally clear > > the write seqno and its domains in the completion logic. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > > Looks really nice. Still I'd like to see some i-g-t nastiness > increases before we frob this code some more. So I'll punt on this for > now ...
I'm happy about the new tests, so merged this patch to dinq. Thanks for botht the cleanup and the igt tests. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
