From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

Pull the code to do the CS timestamp ns<->ticks conversion into
helpers and use them all over.

The check in i915_perf_noa_delay_set() seems a bit dubious,
so we switch it to do what I assume it wanted to do all along
(ie. make sure the resulting delay in CS timestamp ticks
doesn't exceed 32bits)?

Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c        |  3 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h            | 12 ++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c           |  7 ++-----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c |  3 +--
 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index c0e54c500017..4bfa70b94e8f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1890,13 +1890,12 @@ static int
 i915_perf_noa_delay_set(void *data, u64 val)
 {
        struct drm_i915_private *i915 = data;
-       const u32 clk = RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz / 1000;
 
        /*
         * This would lead to infinite waits as we're doing timestamp
         * difference on the CS with only 32bits.
         */
-       if (val > mul_u32_u32(U32_MAX, clk))
+       if (i915_cs_timestamp_ns_to_ticks(i915, val) > U32_MAX)
                return -EINVAL;
 
        atomic64_set(&i915->perf.noa_programming_delay, val);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 1f5dda38e7b4..7640eccdc46c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1955,4 +1955,16 @@ i915_coherent_map_type(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
        return HAS_LLC(i915) ? I915_MAP_WB : I915_MAP_WC;
 }
 
+static inline u64 i915_cs_timestamp_ns_to_ticks(struct drm_i915_private *i915, 
u64 val)
+{
+       return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val * 
RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz,
+                               1000000000);
+}
+
+static inline u64 i915_cs_timestamp_ticks_to_ns(struct drm_i915_private *i915, 
u64 val)
+{
+       return div_u64(val * 1000000000,
+                      RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz);
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index a2f98fb08bf1..f53e2c72ae97 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -1667,9 +1667,7 @@ static int alloc_noa_wait(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
        struct drm_i915_gem_object *bo;
        struct i915_vma *vma;
        const u64 delay_ticks = 0xffffffffffffffff -
-               
DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(atomic64_read(&stream->perf->noa_programming_delay) *
-                                RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz,
-                                1000000000);
+               i915_cs_timestamp_ns_to_ticks(i915, 
atomic64_read(&stream->perf->noa_programming_delay));
        const u32 base = stream->engine->mmio_base;
 #define CS_GPR(x) GEN8_RING_CS_GPR(base, x)
        u32 *batch, *ts0, *cs, *jump;
@@ -3466,8 +3464,7 @@ i915_perf_open_ioctl_locked(struct i915_perf *perf,
 
 static u64 oa_exponent_to_ns(struct i915_perf *perf, int exponent)
 {
-       return div_u64(1000000000 * (2ULL << exponent),
-                      RUNTIME_INFO(perf->i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz);
+       return i915_cs_timestamp_ticks_to_ns(perf->i915, 2ULL << exponent);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index be88eb41035a..d97a0e09b6b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
                read_timestamp_frequency(dev_priv);
        if (runtime->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz) {
                runtime->cs_timestamp_period_ns =
-                       div_u64(1e9, runtime->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz);
+                       i915_cs_timestamp_ticks_to_ns(dev_priv, 1);
                drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm,
                        "CS timestamp wraparound in %lldms\n",
                        div_u64(mul_u32_u32(runtime->cs_timestamp_period_ns,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c
index dea0c5dd2739..c6f3374062c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c
@@ -180,8 +180,7 @@ static int live_noa_delay(void *arg)
 
        delay = intel_read_status_page(stream->engine, 0x102);
        delay -= intel_read_status_page(stream->engine, 0x100);
-       delay = div_u64(mul_u32_u32(delay, 1000000000),
-                       RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz);
+       delay = i915_cs_timestamp_ticks_to_ns(i915, delay);
        pr_info("GPU delay: %uns, expected %lluns\n",
                delay, expected);
 
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to