On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 01:32:54PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote: > On 2020-02-04 at 16:36:17 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 04:59:22PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote: > > > we can't have (pipe == crtc->index) assumption in > > > driver in order to support 3 non-contiguous > > > display pipe system. > > > > > > FIXME: Remove the WARN_ON(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base) != crtc->pipe) > > > till we won't fix all such assumption. > > > > > > changes since RFC: > > > - Added again removed (pipe == crtc->index) WARN_ON. > > > - Pass drm_crtc_index instead of intel pipe in order to > > > call drm_handle_vblank() from gen8_de_irq_handler(), > > > other legacy irq handlers also calls drm_handle_vblank() > > > with intel pipe but those doesn't require this change. > > > > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 8 ++++---- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 4 +++- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 8 ++++++-- > > > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > > > index 878d331b9e8c..5709e672151a 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > > > @@ -14070,11 +14070,11 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > > if (new_crtc_state->hw.active) > > > I915_STATE_WARN(!(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask), > > > "pll active mismatch (expected pipe %c in > > > active mask 0x%02x)\n", > > > - pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)), > > > pll->active_mask); > > > + pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask); > > > else > > > I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask, > > > "pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in > > > active mask 0x%02x)\n", > > > - pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)), > > > pll->active_mask); > > > + pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask); > > > > > > I915_STATE_WARN(!(pll->state.crtc_mask & crtc_mask), > > > "pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected 0x%x in > > > 0x%02x)\n", > > > @@ -14103,10 +14103,10 @@ verify_shared_dpll_state(struct intel_crtc > > > *crtc, > > > > > > I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask, > > > "pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in > > > active mask)\n", > > > - pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base))); > > > + pipe_name(crtc->pipe)); > > > I915_STATE_WARN(pll->state.crtc_mask & crtc_mask, > > > "pll enabled crtcs mismatch (found %x in > > > enabled mask)\n", > > > - pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base))); > > > + pipe_name(crtc->pipe)); > > > } > > > } > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > > > index 33ba93863488..80a6460da852 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > > > @@ -1618,7 +1618,9 @@ intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder(const struct > > > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > > static inline void > > > intel_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe) > > > { > > > - drm_wait_one_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe); > > > + const struct intel_crtc *crtc = intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe); > > > + > > > + drm_wait_one_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)); > > > } > > > static inline void > > > intel_wait_for_vblank_if_active(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum > > > pipe pipe) > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > > > index 22ecd5bc407e..9f8b2566166a 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > > > @@ -2311,6 +2311,8 @@ gen8_de_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv, u32 master_ctl) > > > > > > for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) { > > > u32 fault_errors; > > > + struct intel_crtc *crtc = > > > + intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe); > > > > > > if (!(master_ctl & GEN8_DE_PIPE_IRQ(pipe))) > > > continue; > > > @@ -2324,8 +2326,10 @@ gen8_de_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private > > > *dev_priv, u32 master_ctl) > > > ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > > > I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IIR(pipe), iir); > > > > > > - if (iir & GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK) > > > - drm_handle_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe); > > > + if (iir & GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK) { > > > + drm_handle_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, > > > + drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)); > > > > Missed all the other places. > All other places were legcay handlers so i thought we don't require this > change, > is it require do this change all places to keep same pattern.
Yes. > Please correct me if i am wrong here. > > > > Please just add intel_handle_vblank() which wraps the > > intel_get_crtc_for_pipe()+drm_handle_vblank(). > jani has suggested to use drm_crtc_handle_vblank(), i think > that would be simpler to replace it at all places instead of > intel_handle_vblank(), what is your opinion on that ? That's orthogonal. > Thanks, > Anshuman Gupta. > > > > > + } > > > > > > if (iir & GEN8_PIPE_CDCLK_CRC_DONE) > > > hsw_pipe_crc_irq_handler(dev_priv, pipe); > > > -- > > > 2.24.0 > > > > -- > > Ville Syrjälä > > Intel -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
