On 29-Jan-20 11:50 PM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

The DSB should never be busy here or we messed up somewhere else.
Make this a DRM_ERROR().

This is required, at-least to catch the issue in CI.

Reviewed-by: Swati Sharma <[email protected]>


Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
index a16a78cd0ebe..5bb4ac1610a5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static inline bool intel_dsb_enable_engine(struct intel_dsb 
*dsb)
dsb_ctrl = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DSB_CTRL(pipe, dsb->id));
        if (DSB_STATUS & dsb_ctrl) {
-               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DSB engine is busy.\n");
+               DRM_ERROR("DSB engine is busy.\n");
                return false;
        }

--
~Swati Sharma
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to