On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 01:36:19PM +0530, Vandita Kulkarni wrote:
> In some cases like latency[level]==0, wm[level].res_lines>31,
> min_ddb_alloc can be U16_MAX, exclude it from the WARN_ON.
> 
> v2: Specify the cases in which we hit U16_MAX, indentation (Ville)
> 
> Fixes: 10a7e07b68b9 ("drm/i915: Make sure cursor has enough ddb for the 
> selected wm level")
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index ccbbdf4a6aab..7cdca06be3bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4312,8 +4312,8 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state 
> *crtc_state,
>                               &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
>  
>                       if (plane_id == PLANE_CURSOR) {
> -                             if (WARN_ON(wm->wm[level].min_ddb_alloc >
> -                                         total[PLANE_CURSOR])) {
> +                             if (wm->wm[level].min_ddb_alloc > 
> total[PLANE_CURSOR]) {
> +                                     WARN_ON(wm->wm[level].min_ddb_alloc != 
> U16_MAX);

Pushed to dinq. Thanks for the patch.

>                                       blocks = U32_MAX;
>                                       break;
>                               }
> -- 
> 2.21.0.5.gaeb582a

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to