On 11/11/2019 12:05, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-11-11 09:53:08)
The ordering of the checks in the existing code can lead to holding
preemption not being considered as privileged op.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <[email protected]>
Fixes: 9cd20ef7803c ("drm/i915/perf: allow holding preemption on filtered ctx")
Oops, that'll teach me for not looking at the result more carefully.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
-Chris
My bad... and thanks!
Pushed.
-Lionel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
